Education policy plays a pivotal role in shaping the future of any nation. In the United States, the approaches taken by political leaders reflect broader ideological divides and have profound implications for students, teachers, and communities. When comparing the education policies of Donald Trump during his presidency and Kamala Harris’s proposals, stark contrasts emerge. These differences reveal not only their priorities but also their visions for the country’s educational system.
Trump’s Record on Education
Donald Trump’s tenure as the 45th President of the United States was marked by an education agenda that focused on school choice, deregulation, and a rollback of federal oversight. His administration, under the leadership of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, sought to transform the American education system by empowering parents and reducing the federal government’s role in public education.
-
School Choice and Vouchers
One of the central pillars of Trump’s education policy was the promotion of school choice. Trump and DeVos championed the use of vouchers, which allow public education funds to be used for private school tuition. The rationale behind this policy was to give parents more control over their children’s education and to foster competition among schools, which they believed would drive improvements in educational quality.
Critics, however, argued that vouchers divert much-needed resources from public schools, exacerbating inequalities and undermining the public education system. They contended that vouchers primarily benefit wealthier families who can afford the remaining tuition balance at private schools, leaving disadvantaged students in underfunded public schools.
-
Deregulation and Reducing Federal Oversight
Trump’s administration pursued a broad agenda of deregulation across various sectors, including education. This was reflected in efforts to roll back Obama-era policies, such as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), which had placed greater accountability on schools to ensure all students, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds, received a quality education.
Trump’s approach aimed to give more control back to states and localities, allowing them to tailor education policies to their specific needs. However, critics argued that this approach risked creating disparities in educational quality between states and reduced protections for marginalized students.
-
Higher Education: Focus on Job Training and Deregulation
In the realm of higher education, Trump’s policies emphasized job training and vocational education over traditional four-year degrees. His administration promoted apprenticeships and other workforce development programs, arguing that these paths were more aligned with the needs of the economy and could help address the student debt crisis.
The administration also sought to reduce federal oversight of colleges and universities, including rolling back regulations aimed at for-profit colleges. Critics argued that this deregulation could lead to predatory practices by some institutions, leaving students with high debt and low job prospects.
-
COVID-19 and School Reopening
The COVID-19 pandemic posed unprecedented challenges to the education system, and Trump’s handling of school reopening became a contentious issue. The administration pushed for schools to reopen quickly, arguing that the risks to children were low and that prolonged closures would have detrimental effects on students’ learning and well-being.
However, this approach was met with significant opposition from educators, parents, and public health experts who were concerned about the safety of students and staff. The lack of clear federal guidance on how to reopen safely led to a patchwork of responses across the country, with some schools remaining closed for extended periods while others reopened with varying degrees of success.
Kamala Harris’s Proposals on Education
As Vice President and a former senator, Kamala Harris has articulated a different vision for education, emphasizing equity, increased funding, and the protection of public education. Her proposals reflect a broader Democratic commitment to addressing systemic inequalities and ensuring that every student has access to a quality education.
-
Investing in Public Education
Harris has been a strong advocate for increasing federal investment in public education. She supports substantial increases in funding for Title I schools, which serve a high percentage of low-income students, to address disparities in educational resources and opportunities. Harris has also proposed increasing teacher salaries, particularly in underfunded districts, as a means to attract and retain qualified educators.
Unlike Trump’s focus on school choice, Harris emphasizes strengthening public schools and ensuring that all students, regardless of their zip code, have access to a quality education. Her proposals include expanding access to early childhood education, which she views as critical for closing achievement gaps and setting students up for long-term success.
-
Addressing Systemic Inequality and Racial Disparities
Harris has made addressing systemic inequality and racial disparities in education a central theme of her policy proposals. She has called for federal action to combat the school-to-prison pipeline, which disproportionately affects students of color, by implementing restorative justice practices and increasing mental health resources in schools.
Harris also supports measures to ensure that schools are inclusive and supportive environments for all students, regardless of race, ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation. Her proposals include initiatives to address implicit bias in school discipline and to promote culturally responsive teaching practices.
-
Higher Education: Access and Affordability
In higher education, Harris has focused on making college more accessible and affordable. She supports initiatives to make community college tuition-free and to significantly reduce the cost of attending public universities. Harris has also called for measures to address the student debt crisis, including broad student loan forgiveness and reforms to income-driven repayment plans.
Harris has also proposed increasing federal support for Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and other Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs). She views these institutions as vital to promoting educational equity and providing opportunities for historically marginalized communities.
-
COVID-19 Response and School Safety
Harris’s approach to the COVID-19 pandemic and school reopening was more cautious than Trump’s, emphasizing the importance of following public health guidance and ensuring that schools had the necessary resources to reopen safely. She advocated for increased federal funding to support schools in implementing safety measures, such as improved ventilation, personal protective equipment, and testing.
Harris also emphasized the need for addressing the pandemic’s impact on students, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds. Her proposals include expanded access to broadband internet to support remote learning, increased mental health services, and targeted support for students who have fallen behind due to the disruptions caused by the pandemic.
Conclusion: Two Divergent Approaches to Education
The comparison between Donald Trump’s record on education and Kamala Harris’s proposals highlights two fundamentally different approaches to the nation’s education system. Trump’s policies were characterized by a focus on school choice, deregulation, and reducing the federal government’s role in education. His administration’s approach was aimed at empowering parents and promoting competition but faced criticism for potentially exacerbating inequalities and undermining public education.
In contrast, Kamala Harris’s proposals emphasize equity, increased federal investment, and a commitment to strengthening public education. Her approach reflects a belief in the importance of addressing systemic inequalities and ensuring that all students have access to the resources and opportunities they need to succeed.
As the nation continues to grapple with the challenges facing its education system, the direction chosen by its leaders will have lasting consequences for future generations. The differences between Trump’s record and Harris’s vision underscore the broader ideological divides in American politics, with significant implications for students, teachers, and communities across the country.
In-Depth Review: Education Policies – Trump vs. Harris
The “Road to the Election” website provides a thorough analysis of the education policies of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, offering a clear comparison of their approaches. The site details Trump’s record, highlighting his administration’s focus on promoting school choice, deregulating education, and reducing federal oversight. It also examines the impact of his policies on public education and higher education, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. In contrast, the website outlines Kamala Harris’s proposals, emphasizing her commitment to equity, increased federal investment in public schools, and initiatives to make higher education more accessible and affordable. For those interested in understanding the differing educational philosophies of Trump and Harris, “Road to the Election” offers a comprehensive and balanced overview.
